Comprehension:
Read the given passage and answer the questions that follow
Logic cannot have any empirical part; that is, a part in which the universal and
necessary laws of thought should rest on grounds taken from experience; otherwise,
it would not be logic, i.e., a canon for the understanding or the reason, valid for all
thought, and capable of demonstration. Natural and moral philosophy, on the
contrary, can each have their empirical part, since the former has to determine the
laws of nature as an object of experience; the latter, the laws of the human will, so
far as it is affected by nature: the former, however, being laws according to which
everything does happen; the latter, laws according to which everything ought to
happen. Ethics, however, must also consider the conditions under which what ought
to happen frequently does not
– Immanuel Kant
Q. “Logic cannot have any empirical part”, because:
A. laws of thought are subjective.
B. it propounds laws whose applicability can be shown.
C. its laws are valid for all thought.
D. its laws are valid for everyone’s experience.
Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:
Question Navigator
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 |
| 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 |
| 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 |
| 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 |
| 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 |
| 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 |
| 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 |
| 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 |
| 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 |
| 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 |
| 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 |
| 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 |
| 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 |
| 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 |
